[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?
From: |
Damien Elmes |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:44:58 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> Robert Anderson <address@hidden> writes:
>> Two of them take a -L, --log-message option. tag doesn't. It
>> should, shouldn't it?
>
> I suppose, though it seems less likely that people will use it than
> with the others, as the automatic message is usually good enough.
>
> On a related note, I'd like to add a `-s, --summary SUM_TEXT' option to
> the import command, like I did for commit (the doubled-text effect of -L
> drives me nuts), but import already has a -s option, and I'm not sure
> the best thing to do -- change the meaning of `import -s'? Use another
> short option (-S?), but then that's inconsistent with `commit -s' (and
> the reason I like -s is because many other commands use `-s' as a short
> option for --summary). Gah...
Well, if --setup on import was to be the default, the problem would
go away .. :-) But I don't think Tom's with me on that one.
Cheers,
--
Damien Elmes
- [Gnu-arch-users] -L option for tag?, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?,
Damien Elmes <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19