[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag? |
Date: |
19 Sep 2003 14:07:34 +0900 |
Robert Anderson <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm using "tag version" to mean a version that has a base-0 and all
> subsequent revisions created with a tag command.
BTW, is it alright to use `tag' to create _occasional_ tagged versions
in branch, e.g., base-0 = tag, patch-1 = patch, patch-2 = patch,
patch-3 = tag, ...? This seems convenient in some cases, but I vaguely
recall a warning against it somewhere.
Thanks,
-Miles
--
"I distrust a research person who is always obviously busy on a task."
--Robert Frosch, VP, GM Research
- [Gnu-arch-users] -L option for tag?, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Robert Collins, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Robert Collins, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/09/20
- merge algorithms (Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?), Doran Moppert, 2003/09/20