Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Project Structure

[Dan Kuykendall]

Dave Hall wrote:
> Dan, you have some one inform you of something like this happening.  We had
> a discussion about this the other day - in private chat on IRC ... I still
> have the log of that conversation.  I was pretty clear about what my views were
> on the matter.  Also we wanted the discussion to in the open, so everyone
> knew what the issues were and could participate in the discussion.  This was
> about the community, so the community should be involved ... imo.
>
> I think that the current core team can stand for voting positions - that is
> how i would see them being of equal status.

I simply wont agree with this.

> > As far as founders canceling eachother out in veto. This could happen 
> > most certainly. We are not all of one mind, and often have lengthy 
> > discussions about issues.

> Ok, I am starting to see that we might be able to agree on something here. 
> I would still like activity requirements that must be met before a project
> founder can vote.

Again, I will not agree with this. I will not even bend in the least 
about the permenant positions of the founding four.


> No one has proposed eT as the only option for phpGW.  At the same time I
> think it should be an option for small apps/newbie devs.  I know of one new dev
> is learning php/phpgw thru eT.  Also this is not what you said about eT last
> time we chatted about it.

I was creating an example. As I said, eT is very cool, but I dont want 
it to be "the" template system for phpGW.

> > Without veto I would simply fork the project. If we have veto and ceb 
> > wanted to go against me and cancel my veto, I would fork off with a new 
> > name and let the rest of you keep phpGW. Otherwise I would make you all 
> > go find a new name to work under.
>
> I think that the issue of forks is being over played here.  Yes, when this
> document was first sent some may have though this was a manifesto for a fork -
> it was not.  All those who "signed" the document were unhappy with certain
> issues.  We were willing to fork if it came to it, but i think the last 24
> hours has shown this may be unwarranted.

Forking may still be on the table. You have yet to comprimise on 
anything. Im not going to make the consesions I have without any of my 
demands being met.

Dan