auctex-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: master 9a3078e5 1/2: Fix comments and doc strings


From: Arash Esbati
Subject: Re: master 9a3078e5 1/2: Fix comments and doc strings
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:41:16 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50

Hi Keita,

Ikumi Keita <ikumi@ikumi.que.jp> writes:

> branch: master
> commit 9a3078e5104e29bca1971d600c2c68692094787d
> Author: Ikumi Keita <ikumi@ikumi.que.jp>
> Commit: Ikumi Keita <ikumi@ikumi.que.jp>
>
>     Fix comments and doc strings
>     
>     (TeX-dialect, TeX-unload-style):
>     Fix typos and spacings.

Thanks for the touch-up.  Just 2 small nits:

> @@ -2745,7 +2745,7 @@ Used when checking if any files have changed."
>  (defconst TeX-dialect :latex
>    "Default dialect for use with function `TeX-add-style-hook' for
>  argument DIALECT-EXPR when the hook is to be run only on LaTeX
> -file, or any mode derived thereof. See variable
> +file, or any mode derived thereof.  See variable
>  `TeX-style-hook-dialect'." )

(defconst TeX-dialect :latex
  "Default dialect for use with function `TeX-add-style-hook'.
This applies to the argument DIALECT-EXPR when the hook is to be
run only on LaTeX file, or any mode derived thereof.  See
variable `TeX-style-hook-dialect'." )

>  (defvar TeX-style-hook-list nil
> @@ -2945,7 +2945,7 @@ found in DIALECT-LIST and return the list thereof."
>      ret)))
>  
>  (defun TeX-unload-style (style &optional dialect-list)
> -  "Forget that we once loaded STYLE. If DIALECT-LIST is provided
> +  "Forget that we once loaded STYLE.  If DIALECT-LIST is provided
>  the STYLE is only removed for those dialects in DIALECT-LIST.
>  
>  See variable `TeX-style-hook-dialect' for supported dialects."

(defun TeX-unload-style (style &optional dialect-list)
  "Forget that we once loaded STYLE.
If DIALECT-LIST is provided, the STYLE is only removed for those
dialects in DIALECT-LIST.
    
See variable `TeX-style-hook-dialect' for supported dialects."

Does it make sense?

Best, Arash



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]