autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Release next week?


From: Thomas Dickey
Subject: Re: Release next week?
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 05:23:56 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 02:17:19AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > I think 2.51 will probably be released soon afterwards.  Nonetheless, I
> > would like to introduce deep internal changes: introduce autom4te.  I'd
> > like autom4te to be written in Perl, i.e., starting from 2.51, Autoconf
> > will require Perl, and the same Perl as Automake.  I don't think this is
> > a hard requirement today as anyway I don't think there are many
> > Autoconf-non-Automake projects today.
> 
> One of the parts of my regular day job is compiling free software for all
> the platforms we support.  My experience is that the majority, possibly
> the vast majority, of projects that use autoconf do not use automake.
> 
> Please note that this is not disagreement with requiring Perl, about which
> I have no particular opinion.

I took his statement to mean that the vast majority of the (small number)
of projects which he was working on were entangled with automake.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]