[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ebcdic rule
From: |
Russ Allbery |
Subject: |
Re: Ebcdic rule |
Date: |
02 Oct 2001 15:27:06 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> Wow. Are you actually using such mainframes to run GNU applications? I
> thought that, these days, most of those people were running in ASCII (or
> Latin-1 or UTF-8) mode, even on mainframes.
There's at least an active community of people who ported Perl to EBCDIC
and continue to maintain it, apparently because they're using it
regularly.
--
Russ Allbery (address@hidden) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Ebcdic rule, Pfeiffer Daniel, 2001/10/02
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Paul Eggert, 2001/10/02
- Re: Ebcdic rule,
Russ Allbery <=
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Paul Eggert, 2001/10/02
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Eric Siegerman, 2001/10/03
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Harlan Stenn, 2001/10/03
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Mike Castle, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Mike Castle, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Earnie Boyd, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04