[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ebcdic rule
|
From: |
Mike Castle |
|
Subject: |
Re: Ebcdic rule |
|
Date: |
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 11:28:55 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 11:52:11PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Autoconf is merely a tool for configuring source code for UNIX-like
> systems. That problem is hard enough.
I didn't realize that DOS and NT were considered UNIX-like systems.
mrc
--
Mike Castle address@hidden www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc
- Ebcdic rule, Pfeiffer Daniel, 2001/10/02
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Paul Eggert, 2001/10/02
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Russ Allbery, 2001/10/02
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Paul Eggert, 2001/10/02
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Eric Siegerman, 2001/10/03
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Harlan Stenn, 2001/10/03
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04
- Re: Ebcdic rule,
Mike Castle <=
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Mike Castle, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Earnie Boyd, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04