[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: c99
From: |
Guido Draheim |
Subject: |
Re: c99 |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Oct 2001 21:44:46 +0200 |
address@hidden wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 09:07:54PM +0200, Guido Draheim wrote:
> > > No, that's silly. i'm not going to litter my code with #ifdefs
> > > for old compilers. More realistically, i just want configure to
> > > suggest upgrading gcc if the installed gcc doesn't support C99.
> > > Something like that.
> >
> > however you will notice that many many compilers out there do not
> > support your style - at least not now.
>
> Of course but i can't go back. The ability to declare variables
> anywhere is fantastic. i'm not even tempted to use C++ anymore. :-)
>
if only I had enough time to work and extend the substruct-c into a true
patch on top of gcc - making C a thing being still C and having only
the good features of C++ - but there is no time...
http://guidod.4t.com/substruct-c
cheers,
-- guido Edel sei der Mensch, hilfreich und gut
GCS/E/S/P C++$++++ ULHS L++w- N++@ d(+-) s+a- r+@>+++ y++ 5++X- (geekcode)
- c99, vishnu, 2001/10/12
- Re: c99, Guido Draheim, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99, vishnu, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99, Guido Draheim, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99, vishnu, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99, Paul Eggert, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99, vishnu, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99, Guido Draheim, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99, vishnu, 2001/10/13
- Re: c99,
Guido Draheim <=
- Re: c99, vishnu, 2001/10/14
- Re: c99, vishnu, 2001/10/14
- Re: c99, Guido Draheim, 2001/10/14
- Re: c99, vishnu, 2001/10/18
- Subscribe/unsubscribe, Sang Nguyen Minh, 2001/10/18