[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoconf 2.52g is released
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Autoconf 2.52g is released |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jan 2002 16:14:58 +0200 (IST) |
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> "cp -p" has some unfortunate side-effects (some versions copy the ownership
> of the original file in addition to the protection)
Why is that bad? Those files are typically header files that the
compiler needs to compile the program. If we can live with the original
ownership when building from the source tree, why can't we live with the
same ownership if we build from another directory? What am I missing?
- Autoconf 2.52g is released, Akim Demaille, 2002/01/25
- Autoconf 2.52g is released, John Poltorak, 2002/01/25
- Re: Autoconf 2.52g is released, Bil Kleb, 2002/01/25
- Re: Autoconf 2.52g is released, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/01/27
- Re: Autoconf 2.52g is released, Akim Demaille, 2002/01/27
- Re: Autoconf 2.52g is released, Thomas Dickey, 2002/01/27
- Re: Autoconf 2.52g is released, Bob Proulx, 2002/01/27
- Re: Autoconf 2.52g is released, Russ Allbery, 2002/01/27
- Re: Autoconf 2.52g is released, Thomas E. Dickey, 2002/01/27
- Re: Autoconf 2.52g is released, Bob Proulx, 2002/01/27
- Re: Autoconf 2.52g is released, Thomas Dickey, 2002/01/27