autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Autoconf 2.52g is released


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Autoconf 2.52g is released
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 16:14:58 +0200 (IST)

On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Thomas Dickey wrote:

> "cp -p" has some unfortunate side-effects (some versions copy the ownership
> of the original file in addition to the protection)

Why is that bad?  Those files are typically header files that the 
compiler needs to compile the program.  If we can live with the original 
ownership when building from the source tree, why can't we live with the 
same ownership if we build from another directory?  What am I missing?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]