[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC quoting rules
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: AC quoting rules |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:07:58 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Akim Demaille <address@hidden>
> Date: 05 Feb 2002 11:46:29 +0100
>
> Bruce> Ah, the light dimly dawns. We need M4 to support
> Bruce> pushquote/popquote.
>
> changecom, changequote, changeword and changesyntax are only command
> line options which are moved into the M4 language.... Using these
> guys during the execution is wrong.
Aren't you two in violent agreement? I think Bruce now understands
why changequote doesn't work, and he is thinking of a new GNU M4
feature that should do what he wants. This feature cannot be
implemented in terms of changequote; it has to be a primitive.
Obviously users can't employ the proposed GNU M4 primitive in Autoconf
now, since it doesn't exist yet, but I don't see why it would have to
be avoided if it did its job well.
- Re: saving AC development strength, Paul Eggert, 2002/02/02
- Re: saving AC development strength, Erik Walthinsen, 2002/02/02
- Re: AC quoting rules, Bruce Korb, 2002/02/02
- Re: AC quoting rules, Paul Eggert, 2002/02/03
- Re: AC quoting rules, Akim Demaille, 2002/02/05
- Re: AC quoting rules,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: AC quoting rules, Akim Demaille, 2002/02/06
- Re: AC quoting rules, Bruce Korb, 2002/02/06
- Re: AC quoting rules, Paul Eggert, 2002/02/06
- Re: AC quoting rules, Bruce Korb, 2002/02/06
- Re: AC quoting rules, Akim Demaille, 2002/02/07
- Re: AC quoting rules, Thomas E. Dickey, 2002/02/07
- Re: AC quoting rules, Paul Eggert, 2002/02/07
- Re: AC quoting rules, Akim Demaille, 2002/02/11
- Re: AC quoting rules, Paul Eggert, 2002/02/11