[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --with-foo= vs. FOO=${FOO:-foo_default}
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: --with-foo= vs. FOO=${FOO:-foo_default} |
Date: |
02 Sep 2002 09:57:09 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Russ Allbery <address@hidden> writes:
> Ben Pfaff <address@hidden> writes:
> > In my experience, a cryptic configuration file is almost always an
> > improvement over a configure switch. To change a configure switch, I
> > have to find the program's source code and figure out and go through its
> > configuration, compilation, and installation procedure. To change a
> > configuration file, I just have to find it and edit it, and if it's
> > well-written then it even has a comment above each option explaining my
> > choices.
>
> You've very much missed my point, I think.
Yes. I'll withdraw from the discussion, then.
--
"While the Melissa license is a bit unclear, Melissa aggressively
encourages free distribution of its source code."
--Kevin Dalley <address@hidden>
Re: --with-foo= vs. FOO=${FOO:-foo_default}, Akim Demaille, 2002/09/03