autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: --with-foo= vs. FOO=${FOO:-foo_default}


From: Ben Pfaff
Subject: Re: --with-foo= vs. FOO=${FOO:-foo_default}
Date: 02 Sep 2002 09:57:09 -0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Russ Allbery <address@hidden> writes:

> Ben Pfaff <address@hidden> writes:
> > In my experience, a cryptic configuration file is almost always an
> > improvement over a configure switch.  To change a configure switch, I
> > have to find the program's source code and figure out and go through its
> > configuration, compilation, and installation procedure.  To change a
> > configuration file, I just have to find it and edit it, and if it's
> > well-written then it even has a comment above each option explaining my
> > choices.
> 
> You've very much missed my point, I think.

Yes.  I'll withdraw from the discussion, then.
-- 
"While the Melissa license is a bit unclear, Melissa aggressively
 encourages free distribution of its source code."
--Kevin Dalley <address@hidden>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]