[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: configure.lineno?
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: configure.lineno? |
Date: |
06 Jan 2004 13:32:45 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Peter Eisentraut <address@hidden> writes:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
> > Eric Sunshine <address@hidden> writes:
> > > The configure scripts generated by the newest versions of Autoconf
> > > leave a configure.lineno file sitting around after running the
> > > configure script. Is this intentional?
> >
> > I suspect so, as it helps debugging on hosts that lack line-number
> > support. Automake removes it as part of "make distclean".
>
> Wouldn't a special debug mode be more suitable for that purpose?
Yes, that would make sense. It is odd that 'config.status' has a -d
or --debug option, to do just this, but 'configure' lacks such an
option. I suppose it should have one.
Fixing this in general won't be trivial, as the trap to remove
temporary files (in _AC_INIT_PREPARE) is established after
configure.lineno is created (in _AS_LINENO_PREPARE). The two macros
ought to be decoupled as much as possible, and this would couple them
more.
Also, there's a similar problem with config.status and config.status.lineno.
Anybody want to volunteer to write a patch?
- configure.lineno?, Eric Sunshine, 2004/01/06
- Re: configure.lineno?, Paul Eggert, 2004/01/06
- Re: configure.lineno?, Peter Eisentraut, 2004/01/06
- Re: configure.lineno?,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: configure.lineno?, Eric Sunshine, 2004/01/06
- Re: configure.lineno?, Eric Sunshine, 2004/01/07
- Re: configure.lineno?, Daniel Reed, 2004/01/07
- Re: configure.lineno?, Eric Sunshine, 2004/01/07
- Re: configure.lineno?, Daniel Reed, 2004/01/08
- Re: configure.lineno?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/01/08
- Re: configure.lineno?, Richard Dawe, 2004/01/09
- Re: configure.lineno?, Eric Sunshine, 2004/01/10
Re: configure.lineno?, Eric Sunshine, 2004/01/06