[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: configure.lineno?
From: |
Daniel Reed |
Subject: |
Re: configure.lineno? |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:48:36 -0500 (EST) |
On 2004-01-07T06:45-0500, Eric Sunshine wrote:
) I suppose that nobody has complained about the fact that
) "config.status.lineno" is incompatible with the DOS 8.3 naming restriction?
Neither is "config.status", nor "configure", for that matter.
456 9
--
Daniel Reed <address@hidden> http://naim-users.org/nmlorg/
http://naim.n.ml.org/
I don't like sending my conversation hundreds of miles where a lot
of people can read it o_0 even if I am just talking about cheese. --
Avatar214, re: encryption in naim
- configure.lineno?, Eric Sunshine, 2004/01/06
- Re: configure.lineno?, Paul Eggert, 2004/01/06
- Re: configure.lineno?, Peter Eisentraut, 2004/01/06
- Re: configure.lineno?, Paul Eggert, 2004/01/06
- Re: configure.lineno?, Eric Sunshine, 2004/01/06
- Re: configure.lineno?, Eric Sunshine, 2004/01/07
- Re: configure.lineno?,
Daniel Reed <=
- Re: configure.lineno?, Eric Sunshine, 2004/01/07
- Re: configure.lineno?, Daniel Reed, 2004/01/08
- Re: configure.lineno?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/01/08
- Re: configure.lineno?, Richard Dawe, 2004/01/09
- Re: configure.lineno?, Eric Sunshine, 2004/01/10
Re: configure.lineno?, Eric Sunshine, 2004/01/06