Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99

[Roger Leigh]

Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:

> "Steven G. Johnson" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> (Which begs the question: shouldn't AC_PROG_CC_STDC be renamed to
>> AC_PROG_CC_C89, for consistency?)
>
> Yes, and AC_PROG_CC_STDC should refer to the best (typically, latest)
> C standard.  That is, AC_PROG_CC_STDC should attempt to set the
> compiler into C99 mode, and failing that should attempt to set it in
> C89 mode.  So Roger, please make that part of the next revision for
> your patch.

Sure.

> Also, Roger you'll need to get papers signed for your contribution
> to Autoconf.  Have you already started the ball rolling on this?
> If not, I can send you the initial forms.

I haven't.  If you could send me the forms, that would be great.
Please could you allow it to include all future autoconf contributions
as well?


Thanks,
Roger

-- 
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux        http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.