[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility? |
Date: |
Sat, 13 May 2006 12:56:51 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Ben Pfaff <address@hidden> writes:
> Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Ben Pfaff <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Any comments on whether this is a good idea?
>>
>> It's a good idea, yes. You could use 2.59c. [...]
>
> I'll try to put out a Debian package of a 2.60 pre-release in the
> next few days, then.
I've done this now. I actually generated it from the CVS tree,
for what it's worth.
--
"...I've forgotten where I was going with this,
but you can bet it was scathing."
--DesiredUsername
- expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/09
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Noah Misch, 2006/05/09
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/09
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/09
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Eric Blake, 2006/05/10
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/10
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/10
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/10
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?,
Ben Pfaff <=
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/14
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/14
Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/10