[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: conversion to git
From: |
Andrej Prsa |
Subject: |
Re: conversion to git |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:14:20 -0400 |
> Anyway, this is off-topic for this list, so let's stop here. We'll see
> if this sudden move to git, proves sustainability (I don't have any
> experiences with git - But having not been able to avoid hg/mercurial
> in recent past, I came to the conclusion that hg's usability is not
> in a shape to be wanting it for public use.)
Please don't stop this extremely interesting and useful thread! I don't
think it is off-topic as autoconf has moved to git, and I am pretty
sure most of the audience of this list is interested in version
management, as most of us are software developers! :)
Specifically, I did switch from CVS to Subversion about a year ago and
never regretted it. Now I would really like to learn what people have
to say about git.
Best wishes,
Andrej
- Re: conversion to git, (continued)
- Re: conversion to git, Bob Friesenhahn, 2007/09/19
- Re: conversion to git, Russ Allbery, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Paul Smith, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Warren Young, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Paul Smith, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Ralf Corsepius, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Russ Allbery, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Ralf Corsepius, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Russ Allbery, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Ralf Corsepius, 2007/09/21
- Re: conversion to git,
Andrej Prsa <=
- Re: conversion to git, Russ Allbery, 2007/09/21
- Re: conversion to git, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/09/22
- Re: conversion to git, Eric Blake, 2007/09/22
- Re: conversion to git, Eric Blake, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Bernd Jendrissek, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Bob Proulx, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/09/20