[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Finding dependencies in lib64 or lib
From: |
Ben Taylor |
Subject: |
Re: Finding dependencies in lib64 or lib |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:09:53 +0000 |
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Ben Taylor wrote:
>>
>> Yes. I think most folks just build 32-bit stuff and are done with it.
>> Plus, with the mess that trying to guess what lib%{64} and bin%{64}
>> looks like on each system, I would guess that most folks just
>> throw up their hands... It's probably the tangle-ist of issues
>
> I just use different installation prefixes for 32 and 64-bit code. This is
> trivial to do. Under Solaris I use 'crle' to ensure that my libraries are
> found by default.
I won't touch crle with a 10 foot pole. The chances to botch your system
are so great, it's not funny. Appropriate use of -L/-R flags resolves this
issue.
Ben
Re: Finding dependencies in lib64 or lib, Konstantin Andreev, 2010/02/11
- Re: Finding dependencies in lib64 or lib, Ben Taylor, 2010/02/11
- Re: Finding dependencies in lib64 or lib, Dr. David Kirkby, 2010/02/17
- Re: Finding dependencies in lib64 or lib, Dr. David Kirkby, 2010/02/17
- Re: Finding dependencies in lib64 or lib, Ralf Corsepius, 2010/02/17
- Re: Finding dependencies in lib64 or lib, Ben Taylor, 2010/02/17
- Re: Finding dependencies in lib64 or lib, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/02/17
- Re: Finding dependencies in lib64 or lib,
Ben Taylor <=
Re: [autoconf] Re: Finding dependencies in lib64 or lib, mpsuzuki, 2010/02/11