autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AC_INIT bug-address question


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: AC_INIT bug-address question
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:02:18 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100921 Fedora/3.1.4-1.fc13 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.4

On 10/13/2010 08:50 AM, Miles Bader wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Eric Blake<address@hidden>  wrote:
What does this warning mean?  What's wrong with my bug-reporting
address... is this a bug?

Which version of autoconf?  Does it still happen with 2.68?

2.67   (it's been happening for a while, not sure what version it started with)

I'll try it with 2.68 when I get a chance.

This bit of NEWS from 2.68 is probably relevant then:

** AC_INIT again allows URLs with '?' for its BUG-REPORT argument.
   Regression introduced in 2.66.

It doesn't mention '<' or '>', but those are also characters that fail AS_LITERAL_IF but should pass the new AS_LITERAL_HEREDOC_IF macro that is used in 2.68 (but not 2.67) for the BUG-REPORT argument.

--
Eric Blake   address@hidden    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]