[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_INIT bug-address question
|
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
|
Subject: |
Re: AC_INIT bug-address question |
|
Date: |
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:29:24 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 05:02:18PM CEST:
> This bit of NEWS from 2.68 is probably relevant then:
>
> ** AC_INIT again allows URLs with '?' for its BUG-REPORT argument.
> Regression introduced in 2.66.
>
> It doesn't mention '<' or '>', but those are also characters that
> fail AS_LITERAL_IF but should pass the new AS_LITERAL_HEREDOC_IF
> macro that is used in 2.68 (but not 2.67) for the BUG-REPORT
> argument.
Does it matter that autoconf/general.m4, autoconf/status.m4, and
autotest/general.m4 wrap PACKAGE_BUGREPORT in < ... > in their messages?
Would look a bit ugly as <A U Thor <address@hidden>>.
Cheers,
Ralf