[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: configure -C by default?
From: |
Peter Rosin |
Subject: |
Re: configure -C by default? |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:02:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
Den 2011-02-07 09:14 skrev Ralf Corsepius:
> Provided how HW has developed since the discussions from 10 years
> ago, you cited about, I am actually leaning towards proposing the
> converse of your proposal: Autoconf toconsider to abandoning
> config.cache.
No, it still needs to be optional. Not everybody have the luxury
of running on the bare OS. E.g. Cygwin is not very fast at
running configure and that matters a lot for me since I have a
number of packages with checks for about the same things and they
benefit *very* much from sharing the cache.
Cheers,
Peter
Re: configure -C by default?, Brian Gough, 2011/02/07
Re: configure -C by default?, Eric Blake, 2011/02/07