[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
--silent-rules: status?
|
From: |
Jim Meyering |
|
Subject: |
--silent-rules: status? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:24:40 +0100 |
Hi Ralf,
I am using your new --silent-rules option (from the je-silent branch)
in coreutils, albeit only privately for now.
I would like to make it permanent/public, and noticed that
this is not yet on "next". Do you need more testimonials?
Anything I can do to help?
Thanks for yet another useful feature!
Jim
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] New automake command line option `--silent-rules'., (continued)
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] New automake command line option `--silent-rules'., Raja R Harinath, 2009/03/09
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] New automake command line option `--silent-rules'., Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/03/09
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] New automake command line option `--silent-rules'., Ralf Corsepius, 2009/03/10
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] New automake command line option `--silent-rules'., Jan Engelhardt, 2009/03/10
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] New automake command line option `--silent-rules'., Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/03/10
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] New automake command line option `--silent-rules'., Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/03/11
Re: [PATCH 4/4] New automake command line option `--silent-rules'., Jim Meyering, 2009/03/10
- --silent-rules: status?,
Jim Meyering <=
Re: [PATCH 4/4] New automake command line option `--silent-rules'., Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/03/10
Re: [PATCH 4/4] New automake command line option `--silent-rules'., Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/03/11