[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL |
Date: |
19 Apr 2001 22:59:42 -0600 |
I removed cpan from the CC ilst.
rms> Does "no license changes" mean that the modified version is also
rms> released with notices saying "dual Artistic | GPL"? In that
rms> case, the situation seems perfectly explicit and clear.
Akim, I'm satisfied that we're ok distributing our own Class::Struct.
Do you think we should just rename the module?
Or keep the name and add a configure test?
Tom
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL, (continued)
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL, Russ Allbery, 2001/04/22
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL, Ask Bjoern Hansen, 2001/04/22
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL, Andreas J. Koenig, 2001/04/23
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL, Ken Williams, 2001/04/23
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL, Graham Barr, 2001/04/23
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL, Richard Stallman, 2001/04/22
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/20
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL, Steve M. Robbins, 2001/04/20
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL, Tom Tromey, 2001/04/21
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL, Russ Allbery, 2001/04/22
Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL, Elaine -HFB- Ashton, 2001/04/19