[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: config.guess comments from our sysadmins
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: config.guess comments from our sysadmins |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 20:34:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
[ config.guess and config.sub ]
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:19:29PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > It's safe to just replace the two files with newer versions; I think you
> > should keep the two in sync though.
>
> OK. Should I replace them in every project and check them into the
> codebase?
If you keep generated files in your version control system, then yes,
I'd do that. But only then. I would generally recommend against this
strategy (there are arguments for and against it, see 'info Automake
CVS'; the fact that config.* are not generated does not alter the line
of thought much here).
> Or can I update the automake copies of the files
Yes, that is a good idea...
> so that all my autotools projects will take advantage of them when I
> do autoreconf -i?
...not quite, that won't install files over already-present ones. You
need to use the --force argument for it to do so.
Cheers,
Ralf