[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: $(OBJEXT) equivalent for .lo files?

From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: $(OBJEXT) equivalent for .lo files?
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:03:17 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130402 Thunderbird/17.0.5

On 04/16/2013 07:55 AM, Rhys Ulerich wrote:
> Hi all,
> Explicit dependencies look like
>     foo.$(OBJEXT) : $(srcdir)/foo.F90 bar.$(OBJEXT)
> where $(OBJEXT) serves to insulate one from whether or not the suffix
> is .o for an object file.

$(OBJEXT) is .o on Unixy systems, but .obj on some other platforms.

> What's the $(OBJEXT) equivalent for a .lo file?  I'm providing
> explicit dependencies for some Fortran files and need to express
> things like
>     foo.lo : $(srcdir)/foo.F90 bar.lo
> Or, is the .lo extension guaranteed across platforms?

.lo, on the other hand, is platform independent, so it needs no variable

Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]