[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GSoC] Proposal for "Parse Makefile.am using an AST"
From: |
Kip Warner |
Subject: |
Re: [GSoC] Proposal for "Parse Makefile.am using an AST" |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Mar 2018 16:32:50 -0800 |
On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 20:20 +0100, Matthias Paulmier wrote:
> Thanks I'll have a look. I've used the C version of flex and bison
> already as said in my original post.
>
> However I think we'll stick to Perl for this project. As John Calcote
> said
> (<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2018-03/msg00004.html>),
> Perl has its advantages for such a project and I don't know if a
> lower level programming language would benefit Automake that much.
> Maybe I'm wrong.
Well John's one to know because he literally wrote my favourite book on
the Autotools!
A lot of what Automake does is string manipulation which probably lends
itself well to an interpreted language like Perl.
--
Kip Warner | Senior Software Engineer
OpenPGP signed/encrypted mail preferred
https://www.cartesiantheatre.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [GSoC] Proposal for "Parse Makefile.am using an AST", (continued)
Re: [GSoC] Proposal for "Parse Makefile.am using an AST", Mathieu Lirzin, 2018/03/07
Re: [GSoC] Proposal for "Parse Makefile.am using an AST",
Kip Warner <=