[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is th
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question ! |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:53:26 +0100 (MET) |
Bob Paddock <address@hidden> wrote:
>> restricted to two layers and an area of 100x160 mm²,
> PCB has been used to do 8+ layers with 900+ pin BGAs,
> it has no intentional restrictions.
That's, of course, comparing apples and oranges though. BAE by itself
doesn't have any restrictions, it's just that it's a commercial
program, and this "BAE Light" version imposes some restrictions. The
full version simply costs quite a little more, but if you add more to
that, you can even use it to design an ASIC. ;-)
Of course, I don't expect an opensource tool to impose that kind of
restrictions.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, (continued)
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Vincent Trouilliez, 2009/02/09
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/02/07
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Vincent Trouilliez, 2009/02/07
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, David Kelly, 2009/02/07
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Vincent Trouilliez, 2009/02/07
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/02/08
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !, Bob Paddock, 2009/02/08
- Re: [avr-chat] ATmega644 : dual USART... or not dual usart.. that, is the question !,
Joerg Wunsch <=