[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-chat] Do people like the XMEGA?

From: Weddington, Eric
Subject: Re: [avr-chat] Do people like the XMEGA?
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:59:24 +0000

Hi Rick,

By way of an example, here's an open source project that I ran across real 

"The TinyG project is a many-axis motion control system. It is designed for 
small CNC applications and other applications that require highly controllable 
motion control."
It uses an ATxmega192A3 running at 32 Mhz.
Code is for AVR GCC and is completely open source (GPL).

Now it may not sound like much. Until you see that a TinyG board has been put 
into an Ultimaker desktop 3D printer to control the motors, with some 
impressive results:

I've always liked the XMEGA Event System, and I think it's widely underutilized.

Good luck on your new design! :-)

Eric Weddington

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of Rick Mann
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 8:45 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [avr-chat] Do people like the XMEGA?
> Hi. I'm about to start a new design and I'm looking for lots of GPIO,
> PWM, and USB. It seems the XMEGA parts might fit the bill. I've used
> lots of different MEGA parts, but these are new to me.
> Reading through Atmel's "Getting Started with XMEGA" document
> (http://www.atmel.com/Images/doc8169.pdf), it seems like an awesome
> chip (one that could benefit from a highly platform-dependent small
> RTOS).
> I wonder if anyone has had any negative experiences with them? Is GCC
> support good enough for these parts? How about tools like avrdude?
> Thanks!
> --
> Rick
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-chat mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-chat

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]