[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-chat] Do people like the XMEGA?

From: Thomas D. Dean
Subject: Re: [avr-chat] Do people like the XMEGA?
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:08:57 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2

On 02/15/13 05:14, Bob Paddock wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Rick Mann <address@hidden> wrote:

Also have never fixed the bugs listed in the errata for the 128A1,
instead they came out with a a different part the 128A1U, which in a
regulatory environment creates a expensive paperwork nightmare if you
want to switch (parts have to be as marked if audited, this is the
Government logic need not apply).  So start with the Xmega128A1U in
any new design that you were considering using the 128A1, even if you
don't need USB.

I have a device marked ATXMEGA128A1 AU.  It has the same signarure,
4C 97 1E as the datasheet shows for the ATMEGA128A1U.

How does one tell the difference?

Tom Dean

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]