Re: [Axiom-developer] patches

[Martin Rubey]

Ralf Hemmecke <address@hidden> writes:

> On 03/28/2006 08:57 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
> > I believe that the following procedure for patches would be a *lot* better:
> > * if necessary, open an issue in IssueTracker
> > * upload the patch to MathAction
> > This automatically sends a mail to axiom-developer. In case you want to make
> > sure, you can additionally send a mail to Tim.
> 
> Why don't you use tla?
> 
> Make a new branch from axiom--main--1, hack at the new branch and if it is
> finished, tell Tim that there is something new available ready for merge. Tim
> then could investigate that branch, test and check documentation, and if he
> finds that it is all fine just do a star-merge to axiom--main--1. Would that 
> be
> bad?

Not too bad, but if the patches are available on IssueTracker, I have the
information immediately at hand. I find it easier to look up proposed patches
on IssueTracker than via the ChangeLog of tla.

Maybe I'm wrong here. It's not so important to me.

Martin