[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: GNU Arch - was patches
From: |
root |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: GNU Arch - was patches |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:10:12 -0500 |
> I am also saying that Arch is useless on Windows.
>
> Believe me, if you don't like tla on Unix platforms, you would abhor it
> under Windows. The only way I was able to undo the mess it made of my
> file system under Cygwin (exacerbated I admit by a network domain change
> which stuffed up) was to spend hours changing file permissions and
> renaming directories to Windows acceptable file name lengths on two
> different computers.
>
> Furthermore I was never able to get ssh commits working with Arch.
>
> It will take a very good reason for me ever to use Arch again.
You have a problem with an open source tool.
You have the source.
You have the skill.
Fix the code and send the patches to arch.
It is, after all, exactly what you suggested I do with LTK and GCL.
In the alternate you can use CVS to access sourceforge or savannah
which are up to date sources for Axiom. Thus you really don't need
Arch.
Tim
- RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: GNU Arch - was patches, (continued)
- RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: GNU Arch - was patches, Bill Page, 2006/03/29
- Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: GNU Arch - was patches, Antoine Hersen, 2006/03/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: GNU Arch - was patches, David MENTRE, 2006/03/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: GNU Arch - was patches, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/03/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: GNU Arch - was patches, Frederic Lehobey, 2006/03/30
RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: GNU Arch - was patches, Mike Thomas, 2006/03/29
RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: GNU Arch - was patches, Mike Thomas, 2006/03/29
RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: GNU Arch - was patches, Mike Thomas, 2006/03/29
- Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: GNU Arch - was patches,
root <=
RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: GNU Arch - was patches, Mike Thomas, 2006/03/29
RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: GNU Arch - was patches, Mike Thomas, 2006/03/29