Re: [Axiom-developer] Patches

[Martin Rubey]

Dear Tim, Waldek,

Waldek Hebisch <address@hidden> writes:

> I supect that original author did not know how to leave one partial
> derivative unevaluated, while giving value of the second one (ATM this
> is not clear for me either).  If you know how to to this please go
> on.

below is a patch that has the behaviour as you described it, with the exception
of polygamma, which now throws an error.  If you prefer that polygamma also
allows differentiation with respect to the first argument, the change is
trivial.  I don't have time to modify sttaylor right now.

Martin

combfunc-special.patch
Description: Text Data