bayonne-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bayonne-devel] The next production release update, 1.2.12, long ove


From: David Sugar
Subject: Re: [Bayonne-devel] The next production release update, 1.2.12, long overdue
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:24:58 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Macintosh/20040913)

If I did this, I would probably change the rev number to 1.3.0, so it's clear it's being tested against a different set of dependencies, and merge the ccscript library (should we use the 2.5.6 version?) into Bayonne like was done with the testing branch. What do you think of this?

Luca Bariani wrote:
Il 06:11, venerdì 29 ottobre 2004, David Sugar ha scritto:

I have prepared a new 1.2.12 release of Bayonne which should be out
soon.  This release includes the experimental new multi-party audio
conference patch for use with Dialogic hardware.  With it I have also
experimented with generating a single cross-reference framework document
with doxygen that covers bayonne as well as the common c++ classes, all
in one organized and cross-linked class framework reference document.
As a pdf, it came out at around 800 pages.  I am also looking at some
new options for providing pre-built packages for 1.2.x.

Between illness, a lack of time, a cross-state move, and a number of
other things, it's been awhile since I have been able to properly
address some issues that were left in the 1.2.x releases.  Now that I
have facilities needed to maintain the production release at our new
location, I do intend to better maintain the 1.2.x series better and to
resolve open issues, even after we have a new production series in
active release.  This leads to a question; should we continue using
Common C++ 1.0.13 for the base support lib for future Bayonne 1.2.x
production updates, or should we update Bayonne 1.2.x to use the current
1.2.5 release of Common C++ (and perhaps upgrade to the new ccaudio as
well)?

Since this is a question that effects people who have had 1.2.x
production environments that in a number of cases have been running for
one or more years, I would rather hear some feedback from those who have
been running production environments rather than just making an
arbitrary choice for them.


I prefer an upgrade to Common C++ 1.2.5 (this can fix the MySql write bug)

Luca





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]