[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't |
Date: |
14 Oct 2002 11:17:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter) |
>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
>> So I was thinking that having the user make explicit what they want
>> is a better option.
Paul> But this doesn't follow. If the Bison user doesn't specify any
Paul> action, and if $$ is untyped but $1 is typed, then the user
Paul> can't make use of the default action's side effects, so the
Paul> default action is functionally equivalent to {} in this case.
Paul> So it is purely a notational convenience that the user doesn't
Paul> need to explicitly say "{}" in this case. Bison can implement
Paul> it the same, regardless of whether the user explicitly says
Paul> "{}".
Hm... Convinced :)
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, (continued)
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Paul Eggert, 2002/10/13
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Akim Demaille, 2002/10/13
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Paul Eggert, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Tim Van Holder, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Paul Eggert, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Tim Van Holder, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Akim Demaille, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Akim Demaille, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Akim Demaille, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't, Paul Eggert, 2002/10/14
- Re: Another - Bison 1.35 works but Bison 1.50 Doesn't,
Akim Demaille <=