Re: time for Bison 1.75?

[Paul Eggert]

> From: Akim Demaille <address@hidden>
> Date: 13 Oct 2002 20:55:46 +0200

> Lets wait some more: there are still some messages I would like to
> double check.  Plus, I'm not easy on the regression on headers: they
> are no longer includable in the parsers.  Let's fix that (= decide the
> line to follow) first.

I've fixed the latter problem, I think, in:
<http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bison-patches/2002-October/001198.html>

I just did a quick check and as far as I can see all bugs reported to
bug-bison since 1.50 have been fixed in CVS Bison.
(Enhancement-requests have not been addressed, but that's OK.)

No doubt some other bugs remain, but it'd be nice to get 1.75 out the
door, so that people don't repeatedly report the known bugs.