Re: time for Bison 1.75?

[Akim Demaille]

>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:

Paul> It may be a good time to think about the next Bison release as
Paul> there appear to be some real gotchas in 1.50.

Paul> The only bug reported to bug-bison that is not fixed yet is your
Paul> "Default reductions" bug
Paul> <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-bison/2002-October/001662.html>.
Paul> But I have hesitated to look at that since it sounds like you
Paul> know a lot more about the problem than I do.

I just fixed it :)

Paul> Given RMS's suggestion that we should have called 1.50 "2.0",
Paul> how about if we use the following series of version numbers for
Paul> Bison?

Paul>    1.50 1.75 1.875 1.9375 ...  2.0

That's cute :)

Paul> The idea is that we are in bugfix mode now, and that we keep
Paul> issuing bugfix releases until we're happy, and have converged on
Paul> 2.0.

This is fine with me.  I think we fixed them all.