[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Failure? in autoconf-2.49b testing
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: Failure? in autoconf-2.49b testing |
Date: |
19 Dec 2000 13:32:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
>>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> writes:
Pavel> On 19 Dec 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> >>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> >> 29. ../../../src/autoconf-2.49b/tests/compile.at:119 ignored
>> near >> `compile.at:119'
>>
Pavel> Well, this is slightly too long. The testsuite should not print
Pavel> "near `compile.at:119'". I'll fix it for the next version.
>> I often wondered too. And I can't see why it would be useful, so
>> go ahead.
Pavel> I mean, there may be more than one command in the test causing
Pavel> the test to be ignored. So you can see where exactly the test
Pavel> is ignored.
I'm confused :) What do you mean? Is it the `near' which bothers you?
Pavel> Feel free to remove that message if you are sure that you will
Pavel> never need it.
I was referring to the long path instead of just the basename.