[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61 |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:44:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 05:12:56AM CEST:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:13:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > Pay attention that @samp{#undef} is in the first column, and there is
> > > +nothing after @samp{HAVE_UNISTD_H}, not even white space.
> >
> > FWIW, the current code works fine with white space before '#' and
> > between it and 'undef',
> Or perhaps:
> "The line shall not contain anything else, except white space."
Sounds good to me, thanks.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, (continued)
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Eric Blake, 2008/06/04
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/04
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Stepan Kasal, 2008/06/05
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Eric Blake, 2008/06/05
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/16
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Eric Blake, 2008/06/16
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Eric Blake, 2008/06/17
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Stepan Kasal, 2008/06/18
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/18
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Stepan Kasal, 2008/06/18
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Karsten Hopp, 2008/06/04