[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bash: no job control in this shell

From: Bob Proulx
Subject: Re: bash: no job control in this shell
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:21:51 -0600
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> >You would probably need "q\n" in order to get the data flushed to the
> >subprocess.  This is probably a stdio buffering issue.  When the stdio
> >library determines that the output is not a tty then the output is
> >buffered into large blocks for performance reasons. 
> That doesn't sound right, wouldn't an fflush be better? The '\n' might 
> have undesired side effects.

I was taking that experience from using less inside of an emacs shell
window.  It works there.  :^}


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]