[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m'
From: |
Jeff Chua |
Subject: |
[PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m' |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:27:32 +0800 (SGT) |
Chet,
The man page mentioned that 'set -m' should print 'a line containing their
status upon their completion' ... which should imply 'set +m' should NOT
print the status.
Attached is a patch to 'silent' bash so that it won't print the status
when 'Monitor mode' is off (set +m).
If this is not the right place to do this, please suggest an alternative
to silent bash when 'kill %!' is executed.
Thanks,
Jeff
--- bash/jobs.c.org 2009-11-06 20:26:13.000000000 +0800
+++ bash/jobs.c 2009-11-06 23:55:17.000000000 +0800
@@ -3489,8 +3489,12 @@
signal_is_trapped (termsig) == 0)
{
/* Don't print `0' for a line number. */
- fprintf (stderr, _("%s: line %d: "), get_name_for_error (),
(line_number == 0) ? 1 : line_number);
- pretty_print_job (job, JLIST_NONINTERACTIVE, stderr);
+ if(job_control) {
+ fprintf (stderr, _("%s: line %d: "),
+ get_name_for_error (),
+ (line_number == 0) ? 1 : line_number);
+ pretty_print_job (job, JLIST_NONINTERACTIVE, stderr);
+ }
}
else if (IS_FOREGROUND (job))
{
- [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m',
Jeff Chua <=
- Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m', Chet Ramey, 2009/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m', Jeff Chua, 2009/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m', Chet Ramey, 2009/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m', Jeff Chua, 2009/11/08
- Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m', Jeff Chua, 2009/11/08
- Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m', Chet Ramey, 2009/11/08
- Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m', Jeff Chua, 2009/11/09
- Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m', Chet Ramey, 2009/11/09
- Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m', Marc Herbert, 2009/11/09
- Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m', Chet Ramey, 2009/11/09