[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Error handling question
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: Error handling question |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:43:43 -0500 |
> > With Solaris still shipping a Bourne shell (rather than a POSIX shell)
> > in /bin/sh that means you're stuck with 7th Edition semantics unless
> > you're willing to put in tricks to try to re-invoke your script under
> > /usr/xpg4/bin/sh or /bin/sh5 or ksh or bash or whatever.
>
> Such dicussions are a mine field. But I believe here you are really
> confusing Solaris (quite recent SVR4-like shell) with Ultrix (sh: V7-like
> shell without functions ./. sh5: SVR2-like shell).
Solaris's default shell, though more modern than the old Ultrix one, is not
Posix-conformant. It is more capable than the 7th edition shell,
nevertheless. :-)
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Re: Error handling question, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Error handling question, Jan Schampera, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Greg Wooledge, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Greg Wooledge, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Sven Mascheck, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question,
Chet Ramey <=
- Re: Error handling question, Sven Mascheck, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Marc Herbert, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Chris F.A. Johnson, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Marc Herbert, 2009/11/10
- Re: Error handling question, Marc Herbert, 2009/11/10
- Re: Error handling question, Chet Ramey, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Marc Herbert, 2009/11/10
- Re: Error handling question, Chet Ramey, 2009/11/10