[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bug in force_interactive handling

From: Stas Sergeev
Subject: Re: bug in force_interactive handling
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 22:38:56 +0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0

02.01.2012 22:27, Chet Ramey wrote:
In this case it would be nice for bash to have
a signal that will move the background process
to the foreground.
But there is already a command to do that: fg.
Sorry, mistyped, I meant the other way around: move
the foreground process to the background, then finish
the script, leaving the process alive.
Will your suggestion about the trap handler work
also for ^Z+bg rather than just fg?

 could add a process in between, making the job you're interested in

The extra process in-between is a good workaround,
yes, but I wonder if this can be avoided.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]