[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z? |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:00:48 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
On 06/28/2013 11:50 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:48:09 +0200
>> From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
>> CC: jsmeix@suse.de, chet.ramey@case.edu, arnold@skeeve.com,
>> bug-bash@gnu.org, bug-sed@gnu.org
>>
>> I may even agree, but the fact remains that until you fix it in glibc,
>> you have not fixed it. As long as glibc doesn't change, there's no
>> point in changing everything else. It will only introduce inconsistency.
>
> If glibc is the only place where this problem exists, we can treat
> that as a bug in glibc. Until that bug is solved, we can work around
> it by providing replacement code.
Working around the bug by recompiling 20 separate apps is more painful
and less maintainable than just fixing the bug at the source. Please,
add your opinions to the glibc list to help convince the glibc locale
maintainers to fix their bug.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, (continued)
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Chet Ramey, 2013/06/27
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Johannes Meixner, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Chet Ramey, 2013/06/27
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Chet Ramey, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Chet Ramey, 2013/06/27
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US vs. characterset collation rules for UTF-8, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US vs. characterset collation rules for UTF-8, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US vs. characterset collation rules for UTF-8, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US vs. characterset collation rules for UTF-8, Chet Ramey, 2013/06/28