|Subject:||Re: Bug: different behavior between "jobs -l" and "builtin jobs -l"|
|Date:||Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:53:59 +0000|
On 3/20/17 7:47 PM, Hengyang Zhao wrote:
> I am experiencing an unexpected behavior when using "builtin jobs -l". It
> seems that it's output fd is not as same as "jobs -l" without the builtin
> prefix. So when I piped it into wc, I got different results (as seen in the
> code I pasted below).
> Bash version: GNU bash, version 4.3.43(1)-release (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
> OS: Fedora 25, kernel 4.9.13-200.fc25.x86_64
> Buggy behavior:
> when we have one or more background processes:
> jobs -l | wc # produces 0 0 0
> builtin -l | wc # produces non-zero non-zero non-zero
(This is actually the opposite of what happens, as shown by your examples
> I tried to fix the bug, but after I looked at the code, the jobs printing
> procedure clearly prints to stdout. So I think it's not a easy work to
> track down the bug.
It's not a bug. The first part of a pipeline is always run in a subshell.
That subshell doesn't really have any jobs, since none of the parent's
jobs are children of that shell -- you can't wait for them, for instance.
There is special-case code that attempts to detect when the `jobs' builtin
is running (execute_cmd.c:execute_subshell_builtin_or_function) and doesn't
remove the jobs from the jobs table in that one case, specifically to allow
the output of `jobs' to be piped. Running the `builtin' builtin defeats
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU address@hidden http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|