Re: unset does not remove functions like a[b] unless -f is specified

[Koichi Murase]

2023年2月5日(日) 11:12 Robert Elz <kre@munnari.oz.au>:
>   | In the previous time that I raised the discussion about ``no-argument
>   | return in trap handlers'', I directly posted an email to the mailing
>   | list [1]. Fortunately, I got about ten replies but later,
>   | unfortunately, it was finally forgotten without any conclusion.
>
> Yes, discussions on the mailing list alone tend to end up going nowhere.

Thank you for the kind advice. I have sent an email to the chair, Andrew Josey.

> They're also useful for long discussions about issues that have been
> raised, which don't really belong in the mantis database.   Such
> discussions can be used to alter opinions and provide information which
> can be, and often is, used when decisions are made about the issue.
> They can also get issues believed to be closed reopened.

Now I think I understand the relationship between the mailing list and
the issue tracker better than before. Thank you for the explanation.

> Enter it as an "enhancement" request (when you get to do it).   That's
> for things where the standard could be made better, but which aren't
> actual defects.

Thank you. I'll select it.

> That's unlikely to happen over the weekend, but if you send e-mail now,
> there's no reason it couldn't get done Monday or Tuesday.

Thank you for the information. After I manage to get an account, I'll
try to create an issue. It might be hard to finally make a change in
the standard, but I would like to see what comes out. Thank you!

--
Koichi