[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1.12 dev version number
|
From: |
Tobias Weingartner |
|
Subject: |
Re: 1.12 dev version number |
|
Date: |
Wed, 05 Feb 2003 08:46:48 -0700 |
On Wednesday, February 5, Derek Robert Price wrote:
>
> I currently have the trunk marked as 1.12.0.1, which is potentially
> confusing since previously thius would have meant the dev version
> _after_ a 1.12 release.
After a 1.12 release, comes a 2.0, or a 1.13 release. Why bother with
one dot blargh dot woof dot foo dot meta dot whatever? It just makes it
confusing.
CVS ain't that big. If they are using the CVS version (head), then they
report bugs agains -current (or -cvs). If not, they report bugs against
a simple version number.
--Toby.