[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: adding on branch
Re: adding on branch
Mon, 26 May 2003 10:21:34 GMT
"Max Bowsher" <email@example.com> wrote in message
> Paul Edwards wrote:
> > "Max Bowsher" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
> > news:email@example.com...
> >>> Ok, but an import is another way of adding a "head" version.
> >>> So the import should also go through the same logic, moving a
> >>> file out of the Attic and putting it into the normal spot,
> >> No, if you import on top of a dead head revision, you get a conflict, as
> >> expected, and then you merge, and the commit after that commits and alive
> >> revision, causing the RCS file to move out of the Attic.
> > What I meant was, if you do an import, and no file currently
> > exists, it will automatically add it, and a head will now exist,
> > where none previously existed.
> > So import is different from adding on a branch.
> > Import is expected to create a head version.
> > So if in the Attic there is an existing file, but it only has a branch
> > (file was added on a branch), there is no explicitly-dead head,
> > then that should also be reason to move out of the Attic.
> Um, no. There cannot not be a head. Therefore, when a file is added on a
> branch, there *must* be a dead head added. Correspondingly, importing
> creates a live head revision it creates a new RCS file - but if one already
> exists, there is no reason for import to touch head, and no reason to affect
> the Attic-status of a file.
Logically, I don't think a user submitting an advanced version of
a file, on his own branch, should interfere with the natural behaviour
of an import, which would create a non-dead-head, not in the
Attic. The whole point of a branch is for people to have their
own playpen and not cause harm to the natural processing
outside that branch.
> > At work, our multiple projects are branched off various drops of
> > various imports. The head is never used. So we never get files
> > added on a branch moved out of the Attic unless I do it manually.
> And this is a problem because...?
I have had other problems, can't remember exactly what, and I
solved them by moving them out the Attic. I don't think a file
should be in the Attic if it's counterparts (imported in the same
way) are not.
Re: adding on branch, Paul Edwards, 2003/05/27
Re: adding on branch, Stefan Monnier, 2003/05/27
- Re: adding on branch,
Paul Edwards <=
- Message not available