[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: setenv
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: setenv |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:23:21 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:40:17 -0600 (MDT)
> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
>
> Unfortunately, option 3 depends on intimate knowledge of the library
> internals, and might mean you will need ugly system-dependent code
> that potentially needs to be changed when new versions of the
> libraries are released on each system.
>
> In theory, we would need intimate knowledge. In practice, I think we
> don't. There are just a few parts of Emacs that do anything so
> complex it might fork a process without Emacs's knowledge.
Maybe we need some reality check. Could someone who is familiar with
glibc internals grep its sources for calls to `getenv' or its internal
equivalents, and see how many are there?
> And it would never hurt to add a few extra calls to the function
> that updates the C-level environment, whenever there is doubt.
Yes.
- Re: setenv, (continued)
- Re: setenv, Richard Stallman, 2001/09/21
- Re: setenv, Richard Stallman, 2001/09/20
Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/20
- Re: setenv, Miles Bader, 2001/09/20
- Re: setenv, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/09/21
- Re: setenv, Miles Bader, 2001/09/21
- Re: setenv, Richard Stallman, 2001/09/22
- Re: setenv,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/22
- Re: setenv, Miles Bader, 2001/09/22
- Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/22
Re: setenv, Richard Stallman, 2001/09/23
Re: setenv, Hallvard B Furuseth, 2001/09/24
Re: setenv, Richard Stallman, 2001/09/25
Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/25
Re: setenv, David desJardins, 2001/09/25
Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/25
Re: setenv, Miles Bader, 2001/09/25