[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: setenv
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: setenv |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:59:44 -0600 (MDT) |
> To tell people that modifying process-environment directly is not
> reliable isn't totally out of the question, but it is ugly.
Make it read-only and provide a set-process-environment function,
as you did with enable-multibyte-characters?
That is ugly too. It is much better simply to make the feature work
right, without changing its simple interface.
- Re: setenv, (continued)
- Re: setenv, Miles Bader, 2001/09/20
- Re: setenv, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/09/21
- Re: setenv, Miles Bader, 2001/09/21
- Re: setenv, Richard Stallman, 2001/09/22
- Re: setenv, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/09/22
- Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/22
- Re: setenv, Miles Bader, 2001/09/22
- Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/22
- Re: setenv, Richard Stallman, 2001/09/23
- Re: setenv, Hallvard B Furuseth, 2001/09/24
- Re: setenv,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/25
- Re: setenv, David desJardins, 2001/09/25
- Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/25
- Re: setenv, Miles Bader, 2001/09/25
- Re: setenv, David desJardins, 2001/09/25
- Re: setenv, Miles Bader, 2001/09/25
- Re: setenv, Stefan Monnier, 2001/09/26
- Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/26