[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Writing a patch for the emacs Tex interface
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Writing a patch for the emacs Tex interface |
Date: |
28 Nov 2001 13:37:19 +0900 |
David.Kastrup@t-online.de (David Kastrup) writes:
> Rod> However if I do {\em There was a {\bf cat} on the mat} Then,
> Rod> There was is emphasized and cat bold but on the mat is plain and
> Rod> the bold cat is not emphasized heheh sounds funny, sorry.
>
> Is there a particular reason that you want to go to extra work in
> order to colour a syntax that has been deprecated for more than 6
> years?
Perhaps it's because about 99% of all TeX/LaTex files still use that
syntax... [around here, anyway]
-Miles
--
Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here,
beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?
- Writing a patch for the emacs Tex interface, Rod Farmer, 2001/11/27
- Re: Writing a patch for the emacs Tex interface, David Kastrup, 2001/11/27
- Re: Writing a patch for the emacs Tex interface,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Writing a patch for the emacs Tex interface, David Kastrup, 2001/11/28
- Re: Writing a patch for the emacs Tex interface, William F. Hammond, 2001/11/28
- Re: Writing a patch for the emacs Tex interface, Lee Sau Dan, 2001/11/29
- Re: Writing a patch for the emacs Tex interface, David Kastrup, 2001/11/29
- Re: Writing a patch for the emacs Tex interface, Per Abrahamsen, 2001/11/30
- Re: Writing a patch for the emacs Tex interface, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/29
- Re: Writing a patch for the emacs Tex interface, David Kastrup, 2001/11/29
Re: Writing a patch for the emacs Tex interface, Peter S Galbraith, 2001/11/28