[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:40:10 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> C-x C-s usually means things have been saved and are safe unless
> something happen to the harddisk.
> In abbrevs it is not. And sometimes one doesn't get the chance to
> actually save it because emacs crashes halfway.
> I would propose separating C-x C-s and C-c C-c. C-x C-s should stay
> close to the global key binding.
You mean keep C-c C-c bound to edit-abbrevs-redefine, but change C-x C-s
to call write-abbrev-file? Sounds good (tho it'll have to call
edit-abbrevs-redefine before write-abbrev-file beforehand, of course).
Oh and by the way: the abbrev.el file should be (slowly) fixed to use
the "abbrev-" prefix for all functions and commands, so whenever you
introduce a new function/command/variable please use this prefix rather
than the previous style of <verb>-abbrev-<thing>.
Stefan
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables,
Stefan Monnier <=
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Leo, 2011/03/28
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/28
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Leo, 2011/03/28
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/28
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Leo, 2011/03/28
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/28
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Leo, 2011/03/29
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Leo, 2011/03/29
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/29
- bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables, Leo, 2011/03/29